Compared with the Zurhorst children (see Curious Connections posting), the twelve children of James and Sarah Warrillow must have seemed a breeze! Actually, it was a baker’s dozen if we’re being accurate, as there was a 13th child. Sadly Charles Bennison Warrillow did not make old bones as he was born late in 1881 and died in the 2nd quarter of 1882 (i.e. April, May or June). But, at a time when infant mortality was still much higher than it is now, the other twelve all survived into adulthood (at least one to the age of 90), although chasing them through public records is not made any easier by the variation in the spelling of their surname – Warrillow/Warillow/Warrilow.
It is interesting that the names became more ‘unusual’ the greater the number of children. Edwin Octavius, despite his name has an ordinal number of 7 which might imply that there was another Warrillow child before him but no records have yet been found. Hyacinthe (who rarely referred to herself by the name Exmas, so it may have been a kind of family joke that ended up being perpetuated in the records) was registered in the 1st quarter of 1880 but may have been born at the end of 1879 – one is tempted to believe on Christmas Day itself.
The Warrillow daughter who became a pupil at the School was Gwendoline. No other eligible daughters joined RMIG so the ‘ruling’ on sisters must have been in the ascendancy at this point. However, the records do show that Sarah and Hyacinthe also both attended boarding schools, and Lilian, Eleanor and Dagmar all became teachers which implies a good educational standard. Dagmar, in fact, went off to teach in Newfoundland and the adverts she placed show that she was there from 1910 to at least 1912.
By 1930, she must have been back in England as she travelled to Gibraltar from there and in 1939 she is living with her widowed brother in the Gas Managers House, Lower Bedford Street, Stoke on Trent. The site of the British Gas and Light Company works is next to the Etruria Industrial Museum, where there is a steam-driven bone and flint mill – to produce the ‘bone’ for bone china. The Gas Works have gone although their positions can clearly be seen on a map of 1898.
In 2011, the online Evening Sentinel began a discussion about the gas holder that remained and Roger Warrillow commented:
“My grandfather, James Warrillow, works manager of the then private gas works lived and died at Gas House in 1944 beside the canal next to Shirley’s bone works.”
In fact, a number of the photographs of bygone Stoke on Trent were taken by Ernest James Dalziel Warrillow, MBE, a cousin of the Warrillow Twelve, and son of the above, and whose photographs are now housed in the Warrillow Collection at Keele University.
The Sentinel report went on to say that John Simpson Warrillow, son of James, and John Stanier (later to be the manager) received medals for their actions during the war when aerial bombardment damaged the gas holders. The Supplement to the London Gazette on 7 March 1941 reports the commendations
In the following advertisement for the gas works, dated 1947, we can see that John Stanier was given as Manager. James Warrillow had died in 1944.
But to return to the Warrillows at the centre of this posting, the parents of this large family were James and Sarah Warrillow.
James Warrillow (b Hanley 1842) was an innkeeper in 1871 although he referred to himself by the rather grander title of Wine Merchant in 1881. Between the two dates, he invested (with his brother) in property. The Staffordshire Sentinel and Commercial & General Advertiser of 29 September 1877 reports that he bought the Albion Hotel and 2 adjoining shops for £6200, a fortune for the time!
In an early 19th century directory, such a building is described: “Albion House, at the top of Shelton, is a handsome modern structure, coated with Roman cement, belonging to Mr. W. Parker, a gentleman extensively engaged in the import trade of cobalt and zaffres . . .” Neville Malkin 4th August 1976 and cited by http://www.thepotteries.org/tour/068.htm
James seemed to have owned a significant amount of property to judge from the following notice which appeared after his death in 1886:
And yet his effects as given in his will amounted to £3367 4s 9d. Interestingly, his will also stipulated that neither the Angel nor the Sea Lion were to be sold until his youngest child was 21 years of age [which would have been 1905] but his estate was clearly having none of that! His will also included reference to any other business engaged in by James at the time of his death, which suggests that he was still actively in business at the time of his death.
Trying to reconstruct the facts after the event is virtually impossible. We have no idea why his wishes were ignored: there are many possible reasons, not least of which is an interpretation of his comment that things might be sold after his death in order to release the capital required to continue the businesses and to provide capital for investment in public stocks or in real estate or leasehold (as long as the lease was greater than 60 years).
One thing that is noticeable in his will is that he treats his children alike whether male or female and quite specifically excludes interference of a husband in the daughters’ inheritances. He does assume that a daughter under 21 but married is in the care of a husband and therefore not requiring maintenance from his will but otherwise he states specifically “equally amongst all and every the child or children of mine living” and “equal shares between Brothers and Sisters”. This does seem to be very forward thinking for the time.
He appointed two trustees to be joint executors with his wife in 1876 when his will is dated. One might read this two ways: he is conferring on his wife an honour in assuming she has enough business sense to be equally as capable as the two men or that he didn’t trust her enough! However, six years later, he removes the two trustees and appoints only his wife which leaves one to wonder what had happened in the meantime that he should change his mind.
Sarah Warrillow, nee Tipper, had been born in Cheadle (Staffordshire) in 1843. Clearly running pubs was in the blood as James’ father and Sarah’s parents all did. James’ father, Joseph, appeared to own the Angel before him (which is perhaps why James was reluctant to sell it) although he was also described as a butcher as well as an innkeeper. In the 1890’s the Angel Restaurant was “a handsomely fitted up establishment, where luncheons, dinners, suppers and all refreshments are served in first-class style.” (www.thepotteries.org) By this time both Joseph and James had died but it may well have been James who was instrumental in this development and certainly the description of it immediately after his death would suggest that this was the case. The Angel was still trading as a pub until the 1970s. Now only a part of it remains and is occupied by a building society.
James branched out more into restaurants and refreshment rooms and property in general. In 1911, Sarah is given as the proprietress of a refreshment room. At one point Warrillow owned the refreshment room at Hanley Railway Station but it is unclear whether this is the one of which Sarah is listed as the proprietress. She was by then living in Barlaston and there used to be a railway station there which may have had a refreshment room. It is possible that Sarah was now running this having disposed of all else or still running the refreshment room in Hanley. The station at Hanley was next to what was then the Grand Hotel and the advert of 1905 implies strong competition for a small refreshment room.
The Grand is now called The Quality Inn but there is no longer any trace of the station, buried beneath the car park of the hotel.
Perhaps this helps to explain why, when Sarah died at Ivy Cottage on 27 Dec 1922, leaving her estate to James Warrillow, gas engineer, Edward Octavius Warrillow, grocer, and Arthur Ernest Williams, drysalter (her grandson), it was valued at £1708 0s 8d. This, whilst comparatively comfortable, is clearly significantly below the value of James’ estate in 1886. What can be read into that is very much open to interpretation. As also is the fact that she apparently did not leave any of her estate to any daughters, four of whom were unmarried at the time. Constance, her youngest daughter, was living with her mother in 1911 but was a trained nurse. This does appear to be very different to her husband’s attitude of regarding all children as equal but is again constructing a ‘truth’ after the events.
Ivy Cottage, and its other half Catnip Cottage, are Grade II listed buildings built about 1840. It seems likely that Sarah, whilst living in Barlaston in 1911 was not, in fact, living at Ivy Cottage then. A memorial stone in Barlaston records that Harriet Harvey, who died in 1905, resided at Ivy Cottage. Her husband, Charles, died in 1916 so perhaps this is the point at which Sarah took up residence.
Clearly, however, the latter part of her years was spent in Barlaston. Perhaps she is buried there too although not recorded in a memorial. But then, neither is she recorded in the memorials in Hanley cemetery where her husband and at least two children are buried.
Of course any parent’s lasting legacy is his or her children, some of whom have been mentioned here. The one who became an RMIG pupil is the story that will follow in the next posting.